[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6emjbxxw63ujlyvdodotvvuoo3pcr32y73ilaarquksfguz4bo@2wkdzokk2huk>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 11:50:27 +0200
From: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: amend for wrong
bpf_wq_set_callback_impl signature
On Jul 06 2024, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 1:54 PM Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2024-07-05 at 15:44 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > See the previous patch: the API was wrong, we were provided the pointer
> > > to the value, not the actual struct bpf_wq *.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> >
> > Would it make sense to update one of the tests, so that it checks the
> > specific value put in the map?
> > E.g. extend struct elem:
> >
> > struct elem {
> > int answer_to_the_ultimate_question;
> > struct bpf_wq w;
> > };
> >
> > And put something in there?
>
> +1
> let's tweak the selftest.
OK, v2 it is then :)
Cheers,
Benjamin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists