[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQLvWHd9i0tcTib5cO=AGJN2EG5cCrV02FsLu9JRe54_zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 17:53:53 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: amend for wrong
bpf_wq_set_callback_impl signature
On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 1:54 PM Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2024-07-05 at 15:44 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > See the previous patch: the API was wrong, we were provided the pointer
> > to the value, not the actual struct bpf_wq *.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>
> > ---
>
> Would it make sense to update one of the tests, so that it checks the
> specific value put in the map?
> E.g. extend struct elem:
>
> struct elem {
> int answer_to_the_ultimate_question;
> struct bpf_wq w;
> };
>
> And put something in there?
+1
let's tweak the selftest.
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists