lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50d64ebb-857b-45ad-9f98-70353dfef535@wdc.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 10:52:16 +0000
From: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@....com>, Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>,
	Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, David Sterba
	<dsterba@...e.com>
CC: "linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] btrfs: split RAID stripes on deletion

On 08.07.24 07:26, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On 08.07.24 07:20, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>> Can the ASSERT() be reproduced without a zoned device? (I'm really not a
>> fan of the existing tcmu emulated solution, meanwhile libvirt still
>> doesn't support ZNS devices)
>>
>> If it can be reproduced just with RST feature, I may provide some help
>> digging into the ASSERT().
> 
> Let me check. It's very sporadic as well unfortunately.
> 
> 

OK, I've managed to trigger the failure with btrfs/070 on a 
SCRATCH_DEV_POOL with 5 non-zoned devices.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ