linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] btrfs: split RAID stripes on deletion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d0c28a38-23d4-44f3-9438-e374be1c33d0@wdc.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 05:25:40 +0000
From: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@....com>, Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>,
	Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, David Sterba
	<dsterba@...e.com>
CC: "linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] btrfs: split RAID stripes on deletion

On 08.07.24 07:20, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> 
> Can the ASSERT() be reproduced without a zoned device? (I'm really not a
> fan of the existing tcmu emulated solution, meanwhile libvirt still
> doesn't support ZNS devices)
> 
> If it can be reproduced just with RST feature, I may provide some help
> digging into the ASSERT().

Let me check. It's very sporadic as well unfortunately.