linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 04/10] mm: split a folio in minimum folio order chunks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <D2K7HHAVJDR9.8PR2HQZ00FXA@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 09:53:03 -0400
From: "Zi Yan" <ziy@...dia.com>
To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@...kajraghav.com>,
 <david@...morbit.com>, <willy@...radead.org>, <chandan.babu@...cle.com>,
 <djwong@...nel.org>, <brauner@...nel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: <yang@...amperecomputing.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
 <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <hare@...e.de>, <p.raghav@...sung.com>,
 <mcgrof@...nel.org>, <gost.dev@...sung.com>, <cl@...amperecomputing.com>,
 <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>, <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/10] mm: split a folio in minimum folio order
 chunks

On Thu Jul 4, 2024 at 7:23 AM EDT, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
>
> split_folio() and split_folio_to_list() assume order 0, to support
> minorder for non-anonymous folios, we must expand these to check the
> folio mapping order and use that.
>
> Set new_order to be at least minimum folio order if it is set in
> split_huge_page_to_list() so that we can maintain minimum folio order
> requirement in the page cache.
>
> Update the debugfs write files used for testing to ensure the order
> is respected as well. We simply enforce the min order when a file
> mapping is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/huge_mm.h | 14 ++++++++---
>  mm/huge_memory.c        | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

<snip>
>
> @@ -3265,6 +3277,21 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list)
> +{
> +	unsigned int min_order = 0;
> +
> +	if (!folio_test_anon(folio)) {
> +		if (!folio->mapping && folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)) {
> +			count_vm_event(THP_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED);
> +			return -EBUSY;
> +		}

This should be

		if (!folio->mapping) {
			if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
				count_vm_event(THP_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED);
			return -EBUSY;
		}

Otherwise, a non PMD mappable folio with no mapping will fall through
and cause NULL pointer dereference in mapping_min_folio_order().

> +		min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(folio->mapping);
> +	}
> +
> +	return split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(&folio->page, list, min_order);
> +}
> +
>  void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio)
>  {
>  	struct deferred_split *ds_queue;


-- 
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (855 bytes)