linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rust tree with the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72=zz=U6N_sV8RdxXq9vWYX1FKacOM+neNrciS4Cm-4ozA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 09:53:53 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, 
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rust tree with the block tree

On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 9:53 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Looks good to me, thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel