[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240710000734.6010-1-engguopeng@buaa.edu.cn>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 08:07:34 +0800
From: peng guo <engguopeng@...a.edu.cn>
To: alison.schofield@...el.com
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com,
dave.jiang@...el.com,
dave@...olabs.net,
engguopeng@...a.edu.cn,
ira.weiny@...el.com,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
wyguopeng@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl core:wrong value of macro definition
Sorry, I didn't use the latest code when I checked your reply, so that I didn't see this definition in use.
I just started browsing the CXL related code, and just happened to find this error point when checking the specification.
It will fail when the user uses CXL_MBOX_OP_CLEAR_LOG. So, do I need to continue to update message and make it specific.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists