[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86wmlt39cu.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 10:05:37 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: David Dai <davidai@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...gle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>,
Gupta Pankaj <pankaj.gupta@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] cpufreq: add virtual-cpufreq driver
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 13:51:06 +0100,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 09:30:52PM -0700, David Dai wrote:
> > Introduce a virtualized cpufreq driver for guest kernels to improve
> > performance and power of workloads within VMs.
> >
> > This driver does two main things:
> >
> > 1. Sends the frequency of vCPUs as a hint to the host. The host uses the
> > hint to schedule the vCPU threads and decide physical CPU frequency.
> >
> > 2. If a VM does not support a virtualized FIE(like AMUs), it queries the
> > host CPU frequency by reading a MMIO region of a virtual cpufreq device
> > to update the guest's frequency scaling factor periodically. This enables
> > accurate Per-Entity Load Tracking for tasks running in the guest.
> >
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * CPU0..CPUn
> > + * +-------------+-------------------------------+--------+-------+
> > + * | Register | Description | Offset | Len |
> > + * +-------------+-------------------------------+--------+-------+
> > + * | cur_perf | read this register to get | 0x0 | 0x4 |
> > + * | | the current perf (integer val | | |
> > + * | | representing perf relative to | | |
> > + * | | max performance) | | |
> > + * | | that vCPU is running at | | |
> > + * +-------------+-------------------------------+--------+-------+
> > + * | set_perf | write to this register to set | 0x4 | 0x4 |
> > + * | | perf value of the vCPU | | |
> > + * +-------------+-------------------------------+--------+-------+
> > + * | perftbl_len | number of entries in perf | 0x8 | 0x4 |
> > + * | | table. A single entry in the | | |
> > + * | | perf table denotes no table | | |
> > + * | | and the entry contains | | |
> > + * | | the maximum perf value | | |
> > + * | | that this vCPU supports. | | |
> > + * | | The guest can request any | | |
> > + * | | value between 1 and max perf | | |
> > + * | | when perftbls are not used. | | |
> > + * +---------------------------------------------+--------+-------+
> > + * | perftbl_sel | write to this register to | 0xc | 0x4 |
> > + * | | select perf table entry to | | |
> > + * | | read from | | |
> > + * +---------------------------------------------+--------+-------+
> > + * | perftbl_rd | read this register to get | 0x10 | 0x4 |
> > + * | | perf value of the selected | | |
> > + * | | entry based on perftbl_sel | | |
> > + * +---------------------------------------------+--------+-------+
> > + * | perf_domain | performance domain number | 0x14 | 0x4 |
> > + * | | that this vCPU belongs to. | | |
> > + * | | vCPUs sharing the same perf | | |
> > + * | | domain number are part of the | | |
> > + * | | same performance domain. | | |
> > + * +-------------+-------------------------------+--------+-------+
> > + */
>
> I think it is good idea to version this table, so that it gives flexibility
> to update the entries. It is a must if we are getting away with DT. I didn't
> give complete information in my previous response where I agreed with Rafael.
>
> I am not sure how much feasible it is, but can it be queried via KVM IOCTLs
> to VMM. Just a thought, I am exploring how to make this work even on ACPI
> systems. It is simpler if we neednot rely on DT or ACPI.
KVM should not have to know any of this. This is purely between a
contract (and a pretty weak one) between userspace and the guest.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists