[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240710122215.7b09d347@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 12:22:15 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "Christian Brauner" <brauner@...nel.org>, Christian Göttsche <cgzones@...glemail.com>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the
asm-generic tree
Hi all,
On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 13:44:34 +0200 "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 12:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 10:57:09 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the fs-next tree got conflicts in:
> >>
> >> arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h
> >> arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h
> >>
> >> between commit:
> >>
> >> ea0130bf3c45 ("arm64: convert unistd_32.h to syscall.tbl format")
> >>
> >> from the asm-generic tree and commit:
> >>
> >> e6873349f700 ("fs/xattr: add *at family syscalls")
> >>
> >> from the vfs-brauner tree.
> >>
> >> I fixed it up (I used the former versions) and can carry the fix as
> >> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> >> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> >> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> >> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> >> particularly complex conflicts.
> >
> > This resolution may be not enough as I now get the following warnings
> > from the arm64 defconfig build:
> >
> > <stdin>:1603:2: warning: #warning syscall setxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp]
> > <stdin>:1606:2: warning: #warning syscall getxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp]
> > <stdin>:1609:2: warning: #warning syscall listxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp]
> > <stdin>:1612:2: warning: #warning syscall removexattrat not implemented [-Wcpp]
>
> I see. The newly added syscalls need to be copied from
> include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h into the newly added
> scripts/syscall.tbl. I am aware of this and was planning
> to send this as a fixup afterward to avoid an awkward
> four-way merge with the uretprobe and xattrat patches.
>
> Based on your merge in 1dd7a574e54e ("Merge branch
> 'for-next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/
> git/trace/linux-trace.git"), I think we want this
> to be in all syscall.tbl files:
>
> diff --git a/scripts/syscall.tbl b/scripts/syscall.tbl
> index b0ea892de12e..4873fa3ca496 100644
> --- a/scripts/syscall.tbl
> +++ b/scripts/syscall.tbl
> @@ -419,3 +419,8 @@
> 460 common lsm_set_self_attr sys_lsm_set_self_attr
> 461 common lsm_list_modules sys_lsm_list_modules
> 462 common mseal sys_mseal
> +463 common setxattrat sys_setxattrat
> +464 common getxattrat sys_getxattrat
> +465 common listxattrat sys_listxattrat
> +466 common removexattrat sys_removexattrat
I have added this merge fix patch to the merge of the fs-next tree
today (it is needed when the vfs-brauner tree is merged with the
asm-generic tree):
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 12:16:06 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] fixup for "fs/xattr: add *at family syscalls"
interacting with "arm64: convert unistd_32.h to syscall.tbl format"
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
scripts/syscall.tbl | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/syscall.tbl b/scripts/syscall.tbl
index 797e20ea99a2..86b53c7a815b 100644
--- a/scripts/syscall.tbl
+++ b/scripts/syscall.tbl
@@ -402,3 +402,7 @@
460 common lsm_set_self_attr sys_lsm_set_self_attr
461 common lsm_list_modules sys_lsm_list_modules
462 common mseal sys_mseal
+463 common setxattrat sys_setxattrat
+464 common getxattrat sys_getxattrat
+465 common listxattrat sys_listxattrat
+466 common removexattrat sys_removexattrat
--
2.43.0
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists