lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <caf55fe6-4674-4c89-a94e-f4ad348e2ba0@kwiboo.se>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 16:30:57 +0200
From: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
To: Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>, heiko@...ech.de
Cc: conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] arm64: dts: rockchip: use generic Ethernet PHY
 reset bindings for Lunzn Fastrhino R68S

Hi,

On 2024-07-10 15:30, Chukun Pan wrote:
>> what's the reason behind the changed timings?
>>
>> The original comment stated,
>> 	/* Reset time is 15ms, 50ms for rtl8211f */
>> so that timing change needs an explanation please :-)
> 
> I don't know why this comment says that, but it's clearly wrong.
> According to the PHY datasheet, the RTL8211F PHY needs a 10ms
> assert delay and at least 72ms deassert delay. Considering the
> possibility of mixed use of PHY chips, the reset time should be
> further increased.

Where do you find the 72ms in the datasheet?

In RTL8211F-CG v1.1 I see 10ms and minimum of 30ms, in v1.2 and v1.4
I see 10ms and minimum of 50ms.

I have used 50ms on a few recently added boards and they seem to all
work fine with 50ms, wonder if the deassert delay should be changed for
those boards.

Regards,
Jonas

> 
> Thanks,
> Chukun
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ