[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1e32c72-6bd3-4c15-b301-c5670690ba99@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 13:53:37 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernelci@...ts.linux.dev, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] kselftest: Add test to report device log errors
On 7/10/24 15:49, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 7/10/24 07:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 07:29:53PM -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
>>> Log errors are the most widely used mechanism for reporting issues in
>>> the kernel. When an error is logged using the device helpers, eg
>>> dev_err(), it gets metadata attached that identifies the subsystem and
>>> device where the message is coming from. This series makes use of that
>>> metadata in a new test to report which devices logged errors.
>>>
>>> The first two patches move a test and a helper script to keep things
>>> organized before this new test is added in the third patch.
>>>
>>> It is expected that there might be many false-positive error messages
>>> throughout the drivers code which will be reported by this test. By
>>> having this test in the first place and working through the results we
>>> can address those occurrences by adjusting the loglevel of the messages
>>> that turn out to not be real errors that require the user's attention.
>>> It will also motivate additional error messages to be introduced in the
>>> code to detect real errors where they turn out to be missing, since
>>> it will be possible to detect said issues automatically.
>>>
>>> As an example, below you can see the test result for
>>> mt8192-asurada-spherion. The single standing issue has been investigated
>>> and will be addressed in an EC firmware update [1]:
>>>
>>> TAP version 13
>>> 1..1
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `model_name' property: -6
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `energy_full_design' property: -6
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
>>> not ok 1 +power_supply:sbs-8-000b
>>> Totals: pass:0 fail:1 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>>>
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/cf4d8131-4b63-4c7a-9f27-5a0847c656c4@notapiano
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>
> Is this dependent on a linux-next?
>
> Didn't apply to linux-kselftest next.
>
I tried applying these on top of linux-kselftest next which is at
Linux 6.10-rc7 + other patches.
I am not sure what is wrong - first patch applies and the second
and third don't.
git am fails and manual patch application worked for 2/3, same thing
with 3.3 - these should apply cleanly since they don't have obvious
conflicts.
Please clean this up and send me updated series adding Greg's ack.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists