[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1417b57a-ac0b-4e8c-b157-bbe9ebb14e57@notapiano>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 17:44:12 -0400
From: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernelci@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] kselftest: Add test to report device log errors
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 01:53:37PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 7/10/24 15:49, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > On 7/10/24 07:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 07:29:53PM -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> > > > Log errors are the most widely used mechanism for reporting issues in
> > > > the kernel. When an error is logged using the device helpers, eg
> > > > dev_err(), it gets metadata attached that identifies the subsystem and
> > > > device where the message is coming from. This series makes use of that
> > > > metadata in a new test to report which devices logged errors.
> > > >
> > > > The first two patches move a test and a helper script to keep things
> > > > organized before this new test is added in the third patch.
> > > >
> > > > It is expected that there might be many false-positive error messages
> > > > throughout the drivers code which will be reported by this test. By
> > > > having this test in the first place and working through the results we
> > > > can address those occurrences by adjusting the loglevel of the messages
> > > > that turn out to not be real errors that require the user's attention.
> > > > It will also motivate additional error messages to be introduced in the
> > > > code to detect real errors where they turn out to be missing, since
> > > > it will be possible to detect said issues automatically.
> > > >
> > > > As an example, below you can see the test result for
> > > > mt8192-asurada-spherion. The single standing issue has been investigated
> > > > and will be addressed in an EC firmware update [1]:
> > > >
> > > > TAP version 13
> > > > 1..1
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `model_name' property: -6
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `energy_full_design' property: -6
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > power_supply sbs-8-000b: driver failed to report `time_to_empty_now' property: -5
> > > > not ok 1 +power_supply:sbs-8-000b
> > > > Totals: pass:0 fail:1 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/cf4d8131-4b63-4c7a-9f27-5a0847c656c4@notapiano
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> >
> > Is this dependent on a linux-next?
> >
> > Didn't apply to linux-kselftest next.
> >
>
> I tried applying these on top of linux-kselftest next which is at
> Linux 6.10-rc7 + other patches.
>
> I am not sure what is wrong - first patch applies and the second
> and third don't.
>
> git am fails and manual patch application worked for 2/3, same thing
> with 3.3 - these should apply cleanly since they don't have obvious
> conflicts.
>
> Please clean this up and send me updated series adding Greg's ack.
Oh, now I see what happened. I recently sent another series that touches the
same file (tools/testing/selftests/devices/test_discoverable_devices.py):
"kselftest: devices: Allow running test on more platforms"
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240613-kselftest-discoverable-probe-mt8195-kci-v1-1-7b396a9b032d@collabora.com/
That was already merged through the usb tree, and is present on next (on which I
based this series).
In this case I imagine it's best if this series gets picked through the usb
tree, right? Even if I rebase on kselftest's next, there will be conflicts.
Thanks,
Nícolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists