[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHbLzkpitWRK2q3JidRdyQxajz+MixiO1bX08btVu9Ch0i6Kxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 13:53:04 -0700
From: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@...ian.org>, jirislaby@...nel.org, surenb@...gle.com,
riel@...riel.com, cl@...ux.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
yang@...amperecomputing.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: huge_memory: don't force huge page alignment on 32 bit
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 1:50 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 01:47:00PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -857,7 +857,8 @@ static unsigned long
> > __thp_get_unmapped_area(struct file *filp,
> > loff_t off_align = round_up(off, size);
> > unsigned long len_pad, ret, off_sub;
> >
> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT) || in_compat_syscall())
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32) ||
> > + in_compat_syscall())
>
> Why not:
>
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) || in_compat_syscall())
Nothing specific, just didn't think of it, sigh...
Thanks for the suggestion. Definitely preferable way.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists