[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c26e896-69fa-413b-ace3-39c9698dd6aa@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 13:00:56 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Depeng Shao <quic_depengs@...cinc.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, rfoss@...nel.org,
todor.too@...il.com, mchehab@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: quic_eberman@...cinc.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...cinc.com,
Yongsheng Li <quic_yon@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] media: qcom: camss: Add CSID Gen3 support for
SM8550
On 11/07/2024 12:41, Depeng Shao wrote:
>>> Yes, these are some sequences to initialize the HW.
>>
>> Hm? It's like you ignore the problem and just answer with whatever to
>> shut up the reviewer. Instead of replying with the same, address the
>> problem. Why ordering is not a problem here?
>>
>
> Sorry, I didn't mean that, was trying to understand the problem, then
> just sent out the mail by mistake.
> Do you mean we should use writel to ensure the strict sequences?
> Thanks for catching this problem, this problem is also in the the
> existing camss driver. I will check all of them in this series, but the
> problem in some existing camss drivers, maybe Bryan from Linaro can help
> to fix them, since I don't have these devices to verify the modifications.
_relaxed is used I'm sure because that's what's always been used and
what downstream does.
Is there a good reason for it ? None that I can think of.
Krzysztof is right, there's no good reason to use relaxed() here at all,
you should drop it.
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists