[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91d9bb0f-d9da-6303-c16a-f449b070a4e5@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 18:20:31 -0700
From: "Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, <quic_cang@...cinc.com>,
<quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>, <avri.altman@....com>,
<peter.wang@...iatek.com>, <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
<minwoo.im@...sung.com>, <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
<martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Maramaina Naresh <quic_mnaresh@...cinc.com>,
open list
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] scsi: ufs: core: Support Updating UIC Command
Timeout
On 7/10/2024 10:46 PM, Bao D. Nguyen wrote:
> On 7/9/2024 11:10 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 7/8/24 11:06 PM, Bao D. Nguyen wrote:
>>> +static int uic_cmd_timeout_set(const char *val, const struct
>>> kernel_param *kp)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned int n;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + ret = kstrtou32(val, 0, &n);
>>> + if (ret != 0 || n < UIC_CMD_TIMEOUT_DEFAULT || n >
>>> UIC_CMD_TIMEOUT_MAX)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + return param_set_int(val, kp);
>>> +}
>>
>> The above code converts 'val' twice to an integer: a first time by
>> calling kstrtou32() and a second time by calling param_set_int().
>> Please remove one of the two string-to-integer conversions, e.g. by
>> changing "param_set_int(val, kp)" into "uic_cmd_timeout = n" or
>> *(unsigned int *)kp->arg = n".
> Hi Bart,
> My understanding is that in the kstrtou32() function, the the result of
> the conversion is written to the third parameter only which is '&n' in
> this case. 'val' does not get updated (and it cannot be updated because
> of its 'const' type). Please correct me if I am wrong.
Hi Bart,
Maybe I misunderstood your comment. You probably was concerned about the
execution time of param_set_int(val, kp) vs a single assignment
instruction 'uic_cmd_timeout = n;', right? If that's the case, I'll
update the patch.
Thanks, Bao
>
> Thanks, Bao
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bart.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists