lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <833f19dc-a12f-4d31-a6a0-c3bfda7272c0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 11:02:11 +0200
From: Amer Al Shanawany <amer.shanawany@...il.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
 Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/vc4: remove all usages of of_node_put()

On 18/06/2024 13.54, Amer Al Shanawany wrote:
> On 5/22/24 16:48, Amer Al Shanawany wrote:
>> On 27/04/2024 15.40, Amer Al Shanawany wrote:
>>> Use the scope-based cleanup feature to clean up 'struct device_node *'
>>> when they go out of scope, and remove all instances of of_node_put()
>>> within the same scope, to simplify function exit and avoid potential
>>> memory leaks.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amer Al Shanawany <amer.shanawany@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c  | 14 ++++++--------
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c |  4 +---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c  |  4 +---
>>>    3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c
>>> index c133e96b8aca..bb0bb052e595 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c
>>> @@ -289,7 +289,6 @@ static int vc4_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
>>>        struct rpi_firmware *firmware = NULL;
>>>        struct drm_device *drm;
>>>        struct vc4_dev *vc4;
>>> -    struct device_node *node;
>>>        struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>>>        bool is_vc5;
>>>        int ret = 0;
>>> @@ -302,11 +301,10 @@ static int vc4_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
>>>        else
>>>            driver = &vc4_drm_driver;
>>>    -    node = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, vc4_dma_range_matches,
>>> -                           NULL);
>>> +    struct device_node *node __free(device_node) =
>>> +        of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, vc4_dma_range_matches, NULL);
>>>        if (node) {
>>>            ret = of_dma_configure(dev, node, true);
>>> -        of_node_put(node);
>>>              if (ret)
>>>                return ret;
>>> @@ -341,10 +339,10 @@ static int vc4_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
>>>                goto err;
>>>        }
>>>    -    node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware");
>>> -    if (node) {
>>> -        firmware = rpi_firmware_get(node);
>>> -        of_node_put(node);
>>> +    struct device_node *np __free(device_node) =
>>> +        of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware");
>>> +    if (np) {
>>> +        firmware = rpi_firmware_get(np);
>>>              if (!firmware) {
>>>                ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
>>> index d30f8e8e8967..915e8da3f41a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
>>> @@ -3661,7 +3661,6 @@ static int vc4_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>>>        struct drm_device *drm = dev_get_drvdata(master);
>>>        struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi;
>>>        struct drm_encoder *encoder;
>>> -    struct device_node *ddc_node;
>>>        int ret;
>>>          vc4_hdmi = drmm_kzalloc(drm, sizeof(*vc4_hdmi), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> @@ -3699,14 +3698,13 @@ static int vc4_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>>>        if (ret)
>>>            return ret;
>>>    -    ddc_node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "ddc", 0);
>>> +    struct device_node *ddc_node __free(device_node) = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "ddc", 0);
>>>        if (!ddc_node) {
>>>            DRM_ERROR("Failed to find ddc node in device tree\n");
>>>            return -ENODEV;
>>>        }
>>>          vc4_hdmi->ddc = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(ddc_node);
>>> -    of_node_put(ddc_node);
>>>        if (!vc4_hdmi->ddc) {
>>>            DRM_DEBUG("Failed to get ddc i2c adapter by node\n");
>>>            return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c
>>> index 04af672caacb..6e3613e06e09 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c
>>> @@ -845,15 +845,13 @@ static int vc4_hvs_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>>>          if (vc4->is_vc5) {
>>>            struct rpi_firmware *firmware;
>>> -        struct device_node *node;
>>> +        struct device_node *node __free(device_node) = rpi_firmware_find_node();
>>>            unsigned int max_rate;
>>>    -        node = rpi_firmware_find_node();
>>>            if (!node)
>>>                return -EINVAL;
>>>              firmware = rpi_firmware_get(node);
>>> -        of_node_put(node);
>>>            if (!firmware)
>>>                return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>>    
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch is marked as new/archived on patchwork[1], however it didn't receive any feedback, and a similar patch has been already merged [2].
>>
>>
>> [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20240427134044.38910-1-amer.shanawany@gmail.com/
>>
>> [2]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=d65bfb9546eb627e3c578336355c5b81797f2255
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> Amer
>>
> Hello,
> 
> Could anyone kindly provide some feedback on this patch?
> 
> Thank you
> 
> Amer
Hello all,

I have come to realize that unsubscribing from the mailing list shortly 
after sending this patch prevented me from receiving any feedback. My 
apologies for this oversight.

Thank you

Amer

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ