lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a210424-eac1-957e-dd6e-4290924216e3@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 17:02:55 +0800
From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
CC: linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-kernel
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ben Hutchings <bwh@...nel.org>, kernel test
 robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubi: Fix ubi_init() ubiblock_exit() section mismatch

在 2024/7/13 16:46, Richard Weinberger 写道:
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> Von: "chengzhihao1" <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
>> An: "richard" <richard@....at>, "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
>> CC: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Ben Hutchings" <bwh@...nel.org>, "kernel test robot" <lkp@...el.com>
>> Gesendet: Samstag, 13. Juli 2024 10:16:15
>> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] ubi: Fix ubi_init() ubiblock_exit() section mismatch
> 
>> 在 2024/7/13 15:35, Richard Weinberger 写道:
>>> Since ubiblock_exit() is now called from an init function,
>>> the __exit section no longer makes sense.
>>>
>>> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bwh@...nel.org>
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>> Closes:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407131403.wZJpd8n2-lkp@intel.com/
>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c | 2 +-
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> Looks like that you prefer a simpler fix. Feel fine to add
> 
> Yes, and Ben sent the patch first. :)
>   
>> Reviewed-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
> 
> Thanks for the review!
> And especially thanks for reviewing so many UBI/UBIFS patches,
> I appreciate your help.

You're welcome.
BTW, I have two favors to need your help.
1. Give me some feedbacks about the fsck.ubifs patch series 
[https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-mtd/list/?series=409935], 
maybe you have started looking at them. I know it is a huge reviewing 
work, maybe you can start with using, testing or reading the documents.
2. I reported a 
BUG[https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/346993f2-87f6-e20f-8f5a-d19f84c1604c@huaweicloud.com/T/#m36825671b018880ca17e4c093a4dbfc1b66d5db8] 
recently, please let me know if you have a good solution.

> 
> Thanks,
> //richard
> 
> .
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ