[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1422580650.65606.1720860390692.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 10:46:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: chengzhihao1 <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Hutchings <bwh@...nel.org>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubi: Fix ubi_init() ubiblock_exit() section mismatch
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "chengzhihao1" <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
> An: "richard" <richard@....at>, "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
> CC: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Ben Hutchings" <bwh@...nel.org>, "kernel test robot" <lkp@...el.com>
> Gesendet: Samstag, 13. Juli 2024 10:16:15
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] ubi: Fix ubi_init() ubiblock_exit() section mismatch
> 在 2024/7/13 15:35, Richard Weinberger 写道:
>> Since ubiblock_exit() is now called from an init function,
>> the __exit section no longer makes sense.
>>
>> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bwh@...nel.org>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> Closes:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407131403.wZJpd8n2-lkp@intel.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Looks like that you prefer a simpler fix. Feel fine to add
Yes, and Ben sent the patch first. :)
> Reviewed-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
Thanks for the review!
And especially thanks for reviewing so many UBI/UBIFS patches,
I appreciate your help.
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists