[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bace58-eec4-4b05-981d-5c6f70b7a798@quicinc.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 09:58:32 -0700
From: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
To: Stefan Haberland <sth@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jan Hoeppner
<hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik
<gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian
Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
CC: <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/dasd: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macros
On 7/1/24 03:57, Stefan Haberland wrote:
> Am 16.06.24 um 04:19 schrieb Jeff Johnson:
>> With ARCH=s390, make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports:
>> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in
>> drivers/s390/block/dasd_diag_mod.o
>> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in
>> drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd_mod.o
>> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in
>> drivers/s390/block/dasd_fba_mod.o
>>
>> Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>
> Applied, thanks.
>
I still don't see this in linux-next. Does your tree feed into
linux-next, or will it go into Linus' tree during the merge window?
Hoping to have these warnings fixed tree-wide in 6.11
Powered by blists - more mailing lists