[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c12b2289-aca5-4b2d-9599-e9ca8daa2003@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 10:20:20 +0200
From: Stefan Haberland <sth@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>,
Jan Hoeppner <hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev
<agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/dasd: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macros
Am 14.07.24 um 18:58 schrieb Jeff Johnson:
> On 7/1/24 03:57, Stefan Haberland wrote:
>> Am 16.06.24 um 04:19 schrieb Jeff Johnson:
>>> With ARCH=s390, make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports:
>>> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in
>>> drivers/s390/block/dasd_diag_mod.o
>>> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in
>>> drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd_mod.o
>>> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in
>>> drivers/s390/block/dasd_fba_mod.o
>>>
>>> Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Applied, thanks.
>>
>
> I still don't see this in linux-next. Does your tree feed into
> linux-next, or will it go into Linus' tree during the merge window?
>
> Hoping to have these warnings fixed tree-wide in 6.11
Sorry for the delay.
The DASD patches usually go upstream through the linux-block tree. I
have sent them yesterday and Jens already applied them.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists