[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4bc3e19d-99eb-4004-a6ff-9ab9dc015cde@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 07:33:04 -0700
From: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
To: Stefan Haberland <sth@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jan Hoeppner
<hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik
<gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian
Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
CC: <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/dasd: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macros
On 7/16/2024 1:20 AM, Stefan Haberland wrote:
> Am 14.07.24 um 18:58 schrieb Jeff Johnson:
>> On 7/1/24 03:57, Stefan Haberland wrote:
>>> Am 16.06.24 um 04:19 schrieb Jeff Johnson:
>>>> With ARCH=s390, make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports:
>>>> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in
>>>> drivers/s390/block/dasd_diag_mod.o
>>>> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in
>>>> drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd_mod.o
>>>> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in
>>>> drivers/s390/block/dasd_fba_mod.o
>>>>
>>>> Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks.
>>>
>>
>> I still don't see this in linux-next. Does your tree feed into
>> linux-next, or will it go into Linus' tree during the merge window?
>>
>> Hoping to have these warnings fixed tree-wide in 6.11
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> The DASD patches usually go upstream through the linux-block tree. I
> have sent them yesterday and Jens already applied them.
>
thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists