[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9c74d6ac-56e4-a79b-6d05-705a17561a3d@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 13:05:57 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
cc: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86/intel/tpmi/plr: Fix output in
plr_print_bits()
On Mon, 15 Jul 2024, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Smatch complains that 'str' can be used without being initialized:
>
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/intel_plr_tpmi.c:178 plr_print_bits()
> error: uninitialized symbol 'str'.
>
> In this loop, we iterate over all the set bits and print the name of the
> bit. The intention is that if there is a bit which is between 0-31 we
> look for the name in the first array plr_coarse_reasons[] which has 10
> elements. If the bit is in the 32-63 range we look for it in the
> plr_fine_reasons[] array which has 30 elements. If the bit is in the
> invalid ranges, 10-31 or 62-63, then we should print "UNKNOWN(%d)".
>
> The problem is that 'str' needs to be initialized at the start of each
> iteration, otherwise if we can't find the string then instead of printing
> "UNKNOWN(%d)", we will re-print whatever the previous bit was.
>
> Fixes: 9e9397a41b7b ("platform/x86/intel/tpmi/plr: Add support for the plr mailbox")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> ---
> v2: initialize str at the start of each iteration
Thanks for the update, I've applied this fix now (will go along with the
for-next PR to Linus).
--
i.
>
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/intel_plr_tpmi.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/intel_plr_tpmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/intel_plr_tpmi.c
> index c1aa52c23d25..69ace6a629bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/intel_plr_tpmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/intel_plr_tpmi.c
> @@ -162,10 +162,11 @@ static int plr_clear_cpu_status(struct tpmi_plr_die *plr_die, int cpu)
> static void plr_print_bits(struct seq_file *s, u64 val, int bits)
> {
> const unsigned long mask[] = { BITMAP_FROM_U64(val) };
> - const char *str;
> int bit, index;
>
> for_each_set_bit(bit, mask, bits) {
> + const char *str = NULL;
> +
> if (bit < PLR_COARSE_REASON_BITS) {
> if (bit < ARRAY_SIZE(plr_coarse_reasons))
> str = plr_coarse_reasons[bit];
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists