[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240716152705.juet6srejwq5o6je@joelS2.panther.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 17:27:05 +0200
From: Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
CC: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: treewide: constify the ctl_table argument of
proc_handlers
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:58:10PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2024-07-15 22:23:19+0000, Joel Granados wrote:
...
> > The merge window is now open. I want to send this patch on the Wednesday
> > of next week (jul 24).
>
> Sounds good.
>
> > @Thomas: Some questions
> >
> > 1. Are there any updates?
>
> No.
>
> > 2. Does it still apply cleanly against the latest master branch?
>
> Not against mainline master, but against next-20240715.
> To apply cleanly (and compile) on mainline master it still requires the
> net/ and sysctl trees to be merged.
> Otherwise some modified functions are missing, leading to (trivial) merge
> conflicts or the preparation commits are missing, leading to compilation
> errors.
Understood. I have just sent Linus the changes for sysctl-next, so those
should land in master soon (baring any issues with the pull request).
These [1] and [2] are the two series in net-dev that are the deps for
the constification treewide patch. Once these two go into mainline, then
we are good to go. Right?
>
> > 3. Are you able to do the last update at the beginning of next week (Jul
> > 22)?
>
> Sure.
Thx
[1] net: constify ctl_table arguments of utility functions
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=856252&state=%2A&archive=both
[2] bpf: constify member bpf_sysctl_kern::table
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=854191&state=*
--
Joel Granados
Powered by blists - more mailing lists