[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H6aaAu=0eyEp8am8A+SSj53+CGp7DrCYCxkNZScBd74BQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 21:06:06 +0800
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Cc: Kelvin Cheung <keguang.zhang@...il.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v9 0/2] Add support for Loongson1 APB DMA
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 9:12 PM Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> 在2024年7月16日七月 下午5:40,Huacai Chen写道:
> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 3:00 PM Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 在2024年7月15日七月 下午2:39,Huacai Chen写道:
> >> [...]
> >> >
> >> >> You said that you've accepted my suggestion, which means you recognize
> >> >> 'loongson' as the better name for the drivers.
> >> > No, I don't think so, this is just a compromise to keep consistency.
> >>
> >> Folks, can we settle on this topic?
> >>
> >> Is this naming really important? As long as people can read actual chip name from
> >> kernel code & documents, I think both are acceptable.
> >>
> >> I suggest let this patch go as is. And if anyone want to unify the naming, they can
> >> propose a treewide patch.
> > Renaming still breaks config files.
>
> This is trival with treewide sed :-)
Please read the commit message of b8d3349803ba34afda429e87a837fd95a carefully.
Huacai
>
> Thanks
> - Jiaxun
>
> --
> - Jiaxun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists