lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6cysckb2o54lmg27htyr67mogkprkqjfipmws27fp4rhe3wxwm@edgdbatbeahw>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 18:53:02 -0400
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: Camila Alvarez Inostroza <cam.alvarez.i@...il.com>
Cc: syzbot+4093905737cf289b6b38@...kaller.appspotmail.com, 
	Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcachefs: WARNING in bch2_fs_journal_stop

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 06:49:02PM GMT, Camila Alvarez Inostroza wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2024, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 06:42:55PM GMT, Camila Alvarez Inostroza wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Thu, 18 Jul 2024, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 06:02:39PM GMT, Camila Alvarez wrote:
> > > > > last_seq and last_empty_seq suffered from an off by one error when the
> > > > > journal has no entries.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The indexes were fixed and an assertion is added to check that the
> > > > > last_empty_seq is always kept under the next valid seq number.
> > > > 
> > > > oh nice. I'm going to need to stare at this some more, I still feel like
> > > > this code needs to be clearer and less fiddly.
> > > > 
> > > Sure! Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help.
> > 
> > I'm just applying it - the warning you added gave me warm fuzzies.
> > 
> > I'll let you know if anything pops up in the CI (and I should give you
> > an account so you can point it at your own branches; email me a username
> > and ssh key)
> > 
> Should I give you the info in this same thread or in a separate email?

doesn't matter, ssh pubkeys aren't secrets

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ