linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 38/39] kselftest/arm64: Add a GCS stress test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871q3qxnx6.fsf@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 20:47:49 -0300
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,  Will Deacon
 <will@...nel.org>,  Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,  Andrew Morton
 <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,  Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,  Oliver Upton
 <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,  James Morse <james.morse@....com>,  Suzuki K
 Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,  Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,  Oleg
 Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,  Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
  Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,  "Rick P. Edgecombe"
 <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,  Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>,  Ard
 Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,  Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@....com>,
  Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,  "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,  Paul
 Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,  Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
  Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,  Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
  Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,  Ross Burton
 <ross.burton@....com>,  linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
  linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,  kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
  linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,  linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-mm@...ck.org,  linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,  linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 38/39] kselftest/arm64: Add a GCS stress test

Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@...aro.org> writes:

> # # Finishing up...
> # # Thread-4030 exited with error code 255
> # not ok 1 Thread-4030
> # # Thread-4031 exited with error code 255
> # not ok 2 Thread-4031
> # # Thread-4032 exited with error code 255
> # not ok 3 Thread-4032
> # # Thread-4033 exited with error code 255
> # not ok 4 Thread-4033
> # # Thread-4034 exited with error code 255
> # not ok 5 Thread-4034
> # # Thread-4035 exited with error code 255
> # not ok 6 Thread-4035
> # # Thread-4036 exited with error code 255
> # not ok 7 Thread-4036
> # # Thread-4037 exited with error code 255
> # not ok 8 Thread-4037
> # # Thread-4038 exited with error code 255
> # not ok 9 Thread-4038
> # # Totals: pass:0 fail:9 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
> ok 1 selftests: arm64: gcs-stress

Also, Shouldn't the test report "not ok" at the end considering that
there were fails?
-- 
Thiago