lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef481d85-dff1-4f8f-87ab-5e9086dd8eed@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 12:53:56 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Haylen Chu <heylenay@...look.com>, Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>,
 Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
 Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>,
 Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
 <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
 Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: thermal: sophgo,cv1800-thermal: Add
 Sophgo CV1800 thermal

On 18/07/2024 09:04, Haylen Chu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 11:12:52AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 17/07/2024 07:19, Haylen Chu wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 08:05:10AM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
>>>> Haylen, so you want a compatible that matches an actual SoC and use it
>>>> everywhere?
>>>>
>>>> Or we can add ones for each SoC and have a fallback to cv1800.
>>>
>>> I would prefer "sophgo,cv1800-thermal" and use it everywhere. I don't
>>> see any difference on thermal sensors between cv18xx-series SoCs.
>>
>> Please use proper fallbacks - there is a very specific rule, repeated
>> many times:
>>
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc1/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst#L42
> 
> Just in case I misunderstood,
> 
> You would prefer different SoC-specific compatible strings like
> "sophgo,cv1800-thermal" "sophgo,sg2002-thermal" added to the driver,

There is nothing in above - comment or guideline - mentioning drivers.

> and each thermal-sensor node contains two compatible strings, one
> matches the SoC exactly and one is "sophgo,cv1800-thermal" just as a
> fallback, right?



Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ