linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 6.11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdURvTtambJKd2uYqbRFYO_oBSsFHBunaXNfzvzqbPqbxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 13:25:47 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 6.11

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 8:12 PM David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com> wrote:
> please pull the changes described below. The hilights are new logic
> behind background block group reclaim, automatic removal of qgroup
> after removing a subvolume and new 'rescue=' mount options. The rest is
> optimizations, cleanups and refactoring.
>
> There's a merge conflict caused by the latency fixes from last week in
> extent_map.c:btrfs_scan_inode(), related commits 4e660ca3a98d931809734
> and b3ebb9b7e92a928344a. Resolved in branch for-6.11-merged and that's
> been in linux-next for a few days.

FTR, this is broken on 32-bit (doesn't build, good ;-) and on big-endian
(compiler warnings, no idea how it behaves :-(, so you better don't
trust your data to it in the latter case...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds