[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zp4Ta31U6amqIbI1@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:08:11 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] mm: introduce numa_memblks
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 02:33:47PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 14:13:29 +0300
> Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@...nel.org>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Following the discussion about handling of CXL fixed memory windows on
> > arm64 [1] I decided to bite the bullet and move numa_memblks from x86 to
> > the generic code so they will be available on arm64/riscv and maybe on
> > loongarch sometime later.
> >
> > While it could be possible to use memblock to describe CXL memory windows,
> > it currently lacks notion of unpopulated memory ranges and numa_memblks
> > does implement this.
> >
> > Another reason to make numa_memblks generic is that both arch_numa (arm64
> > and riscv) and loongarch use trimmed copy of x86 code although there is no
> > fundamental reason why the same code cannot be used on all these platforms.
> > Having numa_memblks in mm/ will make it's interaction with ACPI and FDT
> > more consistent and I believe will reduce maintenance burden.
> >
> > And with generic numa_memblks it is (almost) straightforward to enable NUMA
> > emulation on arm64 and riscv.
> >
> > The first 5 commits in this series are cleanups that are not strictly
> > related to numa_memblks.
> >
> > Commits 6-11 slightly reorder code in x86 to allow extracting numa_memblks
> > and NUMA emulation to the generic code.
> >
> > Commits 12-14 actually move the code from arch/x86/ to mm/ and commit 15
> > does some aftermath cleanups.
> >
> > Commit 16 switches arch_numa to numa_memblks.
> >
> > Commit 17 enables usage of phys_to_target_node() and
> > memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() with numa_memblks.
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I've lightly tested with emulated CXL + Generic Ports and Generic
> Initiators as well as more normal cpus and memory via qemu on arm64 and it's
> looking good.
>
> From my earlier series, patch 4 is probably still needed to avoid
> presenting nodes with nothing in them at boot (but not if we hotplug
> memory then remove it again in which case they disappear)
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240529171236.32002-5-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com/
> However that was broken/inconsistent before your rework so I can send that
> patch separately.
I'd appreciate it :)
> Thanks for getting this sorted! I should get time to do more extensive
> testing and review in next week or so.
Thanks, you may want to wait for v2, I'm planning to send it this week.
> Jonathan
>
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240529171236.32002-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com/
> >
> > Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) (17):
> > mm: move kernel/numa.c to mm/
> > MIPS: sgi-ip27: make NODE_DATA() the same as on all other
> > architectures
> > MIPS: loongson64: rename __node_data to node_data
> > arch, mm: move definition of node_data to generic code
> > arch, mm: pull out allocation of NODE_DATA to generic code
> > x86/numa: simplify numa_distance allocation
> > x86/numa: move FAKE_NODE_* defines to numa_emu
> > x86/numa_emu: simplify allocation of phys_dist
> > x86/numa_emu: split __apicid_to_node update to a helper function
> > x86/numa_emu: use a helper function to get MAX_DMA32_PFN
> > x86/numa: numa_{add,remove}_cpu: make cpu parameter unsigned
> > mm: introduce numa_memblks
> > mm: move numa_distance and related code from x86 to numa_memblks
> > mm: introduce numa_emulation
> > mm: make numa_memblks more self-contained
> > arch_numa: switch over to numa_memblks
> > mm: make range-to-target_node lookup facility a part of numa_memblks
> >
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h | 13 -
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 1 +
> > arch/loongarch/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
> > arch/loongarch/include/asm/mmzone.h | 16 -
> > arch/loongarch/include/asm/topology.h | 1 +
> > arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c | 21 -
> > arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/mmzone.h | 1 -
> > .../mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/mmzone.h | 4 -
> > arch/mips/loongson64/numa.c | 20 +-
> > arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c | 2 +-
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmzone.h | 6 -
> > arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 26 +-
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h | 13 -
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/topology.h | 4 +
> > arch/s390/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
> > arch/s390/include/asm/mmzone.h | 17 -
> > arch/s390/kernel/numa.c | 3 -
> > arch/sh/include/asm/mmzone.h | 3 -
> > arch/sh/mm/init.c | 7 +-
> > arch/sh/mm/numa.c | 3 -
> > arch/sparc/include/asm/mmzone.h | 4 -
> > arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c | 11 +-
> > arch/x86/Kconfig | 9 +-
> > arch/x86/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
> > arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone.h | 6 -
> > arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_32.h | 17 -
> > arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_64.h | 18 -
> > arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h | 24 +-
> > arch/x86/include/asm/sparsemem.h | 9 -
> > arch/x86/mm/Makefile | 1 -
> > arch/x86/mm/amdtopology.c | 1 +
> > arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 618 +-----------------
> > arch/x86/mm/numa_internal.h | 24 -
> > drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 1 +
> > drivers/base/Kconfig | 1 +
> > drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 223 ++-----
> > drivers/cxl/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > drivers/dax/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > drivers/of/of_numa.c | 1 +
> > include/asm-generic/mmzone.h | 5 +
> > include/asm-generic/numa.h | 6 +-
> > include/linux/numa.h | 5 +
> > include/linux/numa_memblks.h | 58 ++
> > kernel/Makefile | 1 -
> > kernel/numa.c | 26 -
> > mm/Kconfig | 11 +
> > mm/Makefile | 3 +
> > mm/numa.c | 57 ++
> > {arch/x86/mm => mm}/numa_emulation.c | 42 +-
> > mm/numa_memblks.c | 565 ++++++++++++++++
> > 52 files changed, 847 insertions(+), 1070 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
> > delete mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/mmzone.h
> > delete mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> > delete mode 100644 arch/s390/include/asm/mmzone.h
> > delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone.h
> > delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_32.h
> > delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_64.h
> > create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/mmzone.h
> > create mode 100644 include/linux/numa_memblks.h
> > delete mode 100644 kernel/numa.c
> > create mode 100644 mm/numa.c
> > rename {arch/x86/mm => mm}/numa_emulation.c (94%)
> > create mode 100644 mm/numa_memblks.c
> >
> >
> > base-commit: 22a40d14b572deb80c0648557f4bd502d7e83826
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists