[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ecfe568-6897-6dc5-fda7-50d6424298d9@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:55:50 +0530
From: "Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp)" <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>,
"Rob
Herring" <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
"Imran
Shaik" <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue
<bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] clk: qcom: Add camera clock controller driver for
SM8150
>>>>> - I see that most if not all RCG clocks use rcg2_shared ops instead of
>>>>> using simple rcg2 ops, could you please clarify that?
>>>> As per the HW design recommendation, RCG needs to be parked at a safe
>>>> clock source(XO) in the disable path, shared_ops is used to achieve the
>>>> same.
>>> Does it apply to SM8150? For example, on SM8250 RCG2s are not parked.
>>
>> Yes, it applies to SM8150.
> Should the same logic be applied to other chipsets supported upstream?
> If this is the case, which chipsets?
I will evaluate for what all chipsets it is applicable and post a series
to fix it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists