[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZqO2zOPI6H-r3Ed8@x1>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:46:36 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.ibm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 06/13] perf tools: Enable evsel__is_aux_event() to
work for S390_CPUMSF
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 12:09:46PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 23/07/24 11:26, Leo Yan wrote:
> > On 7/15/2024 5:07 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> >>
> >> evsel__is_aux_event() identifies AUX area tracing selected events.
> >>
> >> S390_CPUMSF uses a raw event type (PERF_TYPE_RAW - refer
> >> s390_cpumsf_evsel_is_auxtrace()) not a PMU type value that could be checked
> >> in evsel__is_aux_event(). However it sets needs_auxtrace_mmap (refer
> >> auxtrace_record__init()), so check that first.
> >>
> >> Currently, the features that use evsel__is_aux_event() are used only by
> >> Intel PT, but that may change in the future.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> >> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>
>
> Namhyung, could we get patches 5 and 6 from this series
> applied? They are independent and Leo's new patch set is
> dependent on patch 5.
I'm getting those two into tmp.perf-tools-next, probably should pick the
rest as peterz has the kernel bits already in his queue.git/perf/core,
right?
- Arnaldo
> >
> >> ---
> >> tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 6 +++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> >> index 986166bc7c78..0b38c51bd6eb 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> >> @@ -1199,8 +1199,12 @@ void perf_pmu__warn_invalid_formats(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> >>
> >> bool evsel__is_aux_event(const struct evsel *evsel)
> >> {
> >> - struct perf_pmu *pmu = evsel__find_pmu(evsel);
> >> + struct perf_pmu *pmu;
> >>
> >> + if (evsel->needs_auxtrace_mmap)
> >> + return true;
> >> +
> >> + pmu = evsel__find_pmu(evsel);
> >> return pmu && pmu->auxtrace;
> >> }
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.34.1
> >>
> >>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists