lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <137068c0-442b-4aba-8950-67828a15cda2@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 19:00:55 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
 Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, Mike Leach
 <mike.leach@...aro.org>, James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
 coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
 Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, Will Deacon
 <will@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
 Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 02/13] perf/core: Add aux_pause, aux_resume,
 aux_start_paused

On 26/07/24 17:41, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 06:06:16PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 18/07/24 15:58, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 01:51:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>
>>>> OK, let me do that and make a few more edits and see if I can stare at
>>>> that next patch some.
>>>
>>> I pushed out a stack of patches into queue.git perf/core
>>> Could you please double check I didn't wreck anything?
>>
>> Looks fine, and seems to work OK in a brief test.
>>
>> Thank you! :-)
> 
> So should I go ahead and pick the tooling patches since the kernel bits
> are merged?

Not exactly merged.  Probably should wait until it is in tip at least.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ