lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72mByZfV62bXkd366GNX1ReF92=rUf9Dyh165Ce+Wc3F2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 23:55:01 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, 
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, 
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clang-format: Update with v6.11-rc1's `for_each` macro list

On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 11:39 PM Javier Carrasco
<javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com> wrote:
>
> A quick test threw 326 extra macros that are defined in internal headers
> under drivers/ and arch/. Including internal headers would remove the
> need to update the list if a macro is moved from inlcude/ to an internal
> header, but the list will need to be updated much more often.

There would be more changes in each iteration (which is why we avoided
scanning everything in the beginning), but currently it is
best-effort. If nowadays there are subsystems that want to start
considering soft-enforcing `clang-format` and that is why they need
them updated as soon as possible, then we should discuss other
alternatives (please let me know if that is the case!).

For instance, we could try to somehow divide the list into individual
subsystems, so that they control it and can perform the updates at the
same time in their commits as needed.

Anyway, for the time being, we should avoid editing the list "manually".

Cheers,
Miguel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ