[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<IA1PR20MB4953991A42D25CED2D4A207EBBB72@IA1PR20MB4953.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 10:02:22 +0800
From: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
To: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>,
Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Xiaoguang Xing <xiaoguang.xing@...hgo.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: dts: sophgo: Add i2c device support for sg2042
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 09:45:42AM GMT, Chen Wang wrote:
>
> On 2024/7/26 9:07, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> > The i2c ip of sg2042 is a standard Synopsys i2c ip, which is already
> > supported by the mainline kernel.
> >
> > Add i2c device node for sg2042.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi
> > index 34c802bd3f9b..eebd6817520e 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi
> > @@ -44,8 +44,61 @@ soc: soc {
> > compatible = "simple-bus";
> > #address-cells = <2>;
> > #size-cells = <2>;
> > + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>
> I would suggest this change (use common interrupt-parent for soc) in another
> separated patch and this would looks more clear.
>
> Then this patch is only for i2c related changes.
>
Yeah, that is kind of reasonable. I will separate it.
> > ranges;
> >
> > + i2c0: i2c@...0005000 {
> > + compatible = "snps,designware-i2c";
> > + reg = <0x70 0x30005000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + clocks = <&clkgen GATE_CLK_APB_I2C>;
> > + clock-names = "ref";
> > + clock-frequency = <100000>;
> > + interrupts = <101 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + resets = <&rstgen RST_I2C0>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + i2c1: i2c@...0006000 {
> > + compatible = "snps,designware-i2c";
> > + reg = <0x70 0x30006000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + clocks = <&clkgen GATE_CLK_APB_I2C>;
> > + clock-names = "ref";
> > + clock-frequency = <100000>;
> > + interrupts = <102 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + resets = <&rstgen RST_I2C1>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + i2c2: i2c@...0007000 {
> > + compatible = "snps,designware-i2c";
> > + reg = <0x70 0x30007000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + clocks = <&clkgen GATE_CLK_APB_I2C>;
> > + clock-names = "ref";
> > + clock-frequency = <100000>;
> > + interrupts = <103 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + resets = <&rstgen RST_I2C2>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + i2c3: i2c@...0008000 {
> > + compatible = "snps,designware-i2c";
> > + reg = <0x70 0x30008000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + clocks = <&clkgen GATE_CLK_APB_I2C>;
> > + clock-names = "ref";
> > + clock-frequency = <100000>;
> > + interrupts = <104 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + resets = <&rstgen RST_I2C3>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > pllclk: clock-controller@...00100c0 {
> > compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-pll";
> > reg = <0x70 0x300100c0 0x0 0x40>;
> > @@ -388,7 +441,6 @@ rstgen: reset-controller@...0013000 {
> > uart0: serial@...0000000 {
> > compatible = "snps,dw-apb-uart";
> > reg = <0x00000070 0x40000000 0x00000000 0x00001000>;
> > - interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> I would prefer this change in a separated patch which has been mentioned
> upon.
> > interrupts = <112 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > clock-frequency = <500000000>;
> > clocks = <&clkgen GATE_CLK_UART_500M>,
> > --
> > 2.45.2
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists