linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] firmware: ti

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240730150722.bzls2qrfqwlmh6mn@clergyman>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:07:22 -0500
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
CC: Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Vibhore Vardhan <vibhore@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Dhruva
 Gole <d-gole@...com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] firmware: ti_sci: Partial-IO support

On 15:01-20240730, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> > > +
> > > +	return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  /* Description for K2G */
> > >  static const struct ti_sci_desc ti_sci_pmmc_k2g_desc = {
> > >  	.default_host_id = 2,
> > > @@ -3398,6 +3485,35 @@ static int ti_sci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  		goto out;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > +	if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "ti,partial-io-wakeup-sources")) {
> > 
> > You should probably check on TISCI_MSG_QUERY_FW_CAPS[1] if
> > Partial IO on low power mode is supported as well? if there is a
> > mismatch, report so?
> 
> I actually have another series in my queue that introduces this check. I
> just implemented this check for Partial-IO yesterday in the patch that
> introduces fw capabilities. If you like I can switch these series
> around.

Yes, please introduce it part of the series.

> 
> > 
> > > +		info->nr_wakeup_sources =
> > > +			of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node,
> > > +						   "ti,partial-io-wakeup-sources",
> > > +						   NULL);
> > > +		info->wakeup_source_nodes =
> > > +			devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*info->wakeup_source_nodes),
> > > +				     GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +
> > > +		for (i = 0; i != info->nr_wakeup_sources; ++i) {
> > > +			struct device_node *devnode =
> > > +				of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node,
> > > +						 "ti,partial-io-wakeup-sources",
> > > +						 i);
> > > +			info->wakeup_source_nodes[i] = devnode;
> > 
> > Curious: Don't we need to maintain reference counting for the devnode
> > if CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC?
> 
> In case you mean I missed of_node_put(), yes, I did, thank you. I added
> it in a ti_sci_remove().

And unless I am mistaken, of_node_get as required as you are
retaining the reference of the node till shutdown / remove is invoked.

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D