[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ikwm7waq.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 17:07:41 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: David Wang <00107082@....com>, liaoyu15@...wei.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [Regression] 6.11.0-rc1: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in
preemptible when suspend the system
On Tue, Jul 30 2024 at 22:25, David Wang wrote:
> When I suspend my system, via `systemctl suspend`, kernel BUG shows up in log:
>
> kernel: [ 1734.412974] smpboot: CPU 2 is now offline
> kernel: [ 1734.414952] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: systemd-sleep/4619
> kernel: [ 1734.414957] caller is hotplug_cpu__broadcast_tick_pull+0x1c/0xc0
The below should fix that.
Thanks,
tglx
---
--- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
@@ -1141,7 +1141,6 @@ void tick_broadcast_switch_to_oneshot(vo
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
void hotplug_cpu__broadcast_tick_pull(int deadcpu)
{
- struct tick_device *td = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_device);
struct clock_event_device *bc;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -1167,6 +1166,8 @@ void hotplug_cpu__broadcast_tick_pull(in
* device to avoid the starvation.
*/
if (tick_check_broadcast_expired()) {
+ struct tick_device *td = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_device);
+
cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), tick_broadcast_force_mask);
tick_program_event(td->evtdev->next_event, 1);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists