lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024073032-ferret-obtrusive-3ce4@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 11:11:45 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: wujing <realwujing@...com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, dongml2@...natelecom.cn,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	yuanql9@...natelecom.cn, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	mengong8.dong@...il.com
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Correct CPU selection from isolated
 domain

On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 05:03:38PM +0800, wujing wrote:
> > If you're trying to backport something, I think you forgot to Cc stable
> > and provide the proper upstream commit.
> >
> > As is this isn't something I can do anything with. The patch does not
> > apply to any recent kernel and AFAICT this issue has long since been
> > fixed.
> 
> When fixing this bug, I didn't pay much attention to upstream changes.
> Upon reviewing the history of relevant commits, I found that they have
> been merged and reverted multiple times:
> 
> ```bash
> git log -S 'cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd))' --oneline \
> kernel/sched/fair.c
> 
> 8aeaffef8c6e sched/fair: Take the scheduling domain into account in select_idle_smt()
> 3e6efe87cd5c sched/fair: Remove redundant check in select_idle_smt()
> 3e8c6c9aac42 sched/fair: Remove task_util from effective utilization in feec()
> c722f35b513f sched/fair: Bring back select_idle_smt(), but differently
> 6cd56ef1df39 sched/fair: Remove select_idle_smt()
> df3cb4ea1fb6 sched/fair: Fix wrong cpu selecting from isolated domain
> ```
> 
> The latest upstream commit 8aeaffef8c6e is not applicable to linux-4.19.y.
> The current patch has been tested on linux-4.19.y and I am looking forward
> to its inclusion in the stable version.

What "current patch"?

confused,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ