[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGndiTNdCGuHRmnp+G-=_PzTaLXnUZpuXAT8dK-wdoG7Mpwt4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 10:45:01 -0700
From: Richard Fung <richardfung@...gle.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: fs-verity: aoid out-of-range comparison
> I think this was just defensive coding to ensure that the assignment to iov_len can't overflow regardless of the type of digest_size
I agree with this. Removing it sounds good to me
Powered by blists - more mailing lists