[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65f25d99-bf27-4521-944e-7ebfe3447a14@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 23:29:22 -0500
From: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, corbet@....net, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, gospo@...adcom.com, michael.chan@...adcom.com,
ajit.khaparde@...adcom.com, somnath.kotur@...adcom.com,
andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com, manoj.panicker2@....com,
Eric.VanTassell@....com, vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev, horms@...nel.org,
bagasdotme@...il.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 04/10] PCI/TPH: Add pci=nostmode to force No ST Mode
On 7/23/24 17:44, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>> @@ -4656,6 +4656,7 @@
>> norid [S390] ignore the RID field and force use of
>> one PCI domain per PCI function
>> notph [PCIE] Do not use PCIe TPH
>> + nostmode [PCIE] Force TPH to use No ST Mode
>
> Needs a little more context here about what this means. Users won't
> know where to even look for "No ST Mode" unless they have a copy of
> the spec.
>
I can certainly add more description to talk about "No ST Mode". Also,
will "tph_nostmode" be better than "nostmode" in your opinion?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists