linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] dt-bindings: PCI: Cleanup of brcmstb YAML and add 7712 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e1002187-fca0-455c-840c-32489e5eadb4@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 08:43:46 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
 Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
 Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
 Cyril Brulebois <kibi@...ian.org>, Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...e.de>,
 Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
 bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, jim2101024@...il.com
Cc: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
 Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
 <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
 <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] dt-bindings: PCI: Cleanup of brcmstb YAML and
 add 7712 SoC

On 01/08/2024 00:28, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical
> o Use "maxItems" where needed.

I asked at v3 and then in v4 about splitting this. You never responded
to that comment, so sorry I won't be repeating the same thing in v5.

NAK.

Best regards,
Krzysztof