[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30814906.IcDJEyoAGT@bagend>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 16:19:20 +0200
From: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>
To: Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan <jin@...iatomb.cc>,
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@...ts.zabbadoz.net>
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2 RESEND] Add DTS for NanoPi R2S Plus
On Friday, 2 August 2024 15:57:26 CEST Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> Uhm... I am confused now, I copy-pasted the emmc block from this file:
> > https://github.com/friendlyarm/uboot-rockchip/blob/nanopi4-v2017.09/arch/a
> > rm/dts/rk3328-nanopi-r2.dts#L7
> >
> > The header does not have the "OR MIT" in there, it's just
> > "SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+" which is what I also copied
> > over, together with the (c) part.
> >
> > The source which I was using is described in the commit message:
> >
> > The eMMC configuration for the DTS has been extracted and copied from
> > rk3328-nanopi-r2.dts, v2017.09 branch from the friendlyarm/uboot-rockchip
> > repository.
> >
> > Maybe you looked at a different branch? Shall I still add the "OR
> > MIT" or leave it as in the original file which I copied it from?
>
> That explains also why there's no sdmmc_ext/sdio bits...
>
> See here for more:
> https://github.com/friendlyarm/kernel-rockchip/blob/nanopi-r2-v6.1.y/arch/ar
> m64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-nanopi-r2-rev24.dts
>
> My current believe is that rockchip/rk3328.dtsi needs the additional
> sdmmc_ext: mmc@...f0000
A commit with that was recently accepted:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git/commit/?h=v6.12-armsoc/dts64&id=82e3aaae388199a0aff33e5371db307b3274f77a
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists