linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] fs/file.c: optimize the critical section of file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240802142248.GV5334@ZenIV>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 15:22:48 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: jack@...e.cz, mjguzik@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	Yu Ma <yu.ma@...el.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pan.deng@...el.com,
	tianyou.li@...el.com, tim.c.chen@...el.com,
	tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] fs/file.c: optimize the critical section of
 file_lock in

On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 01:04:44PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > Hmm...   Something fishy's going on - those are not reachable by any branches.
> 
> Hm, they probably got dropped when rebasing to v6.11-rc1 and I did have
> to play around with --onto.
> 
> > I'm putting together (in viro/vfs.git) a branch for that area (#work.fdtable)
> > and I'm going to apply those 3 unless anyone objects.
> 
> Fine since they aren't in that branch. Otherwise I generally prefer to
> just merge a common branch.

If it's going to be rebased anyway, I don't see much difference from cherry-pick,
TBH...