linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] fs/file.c: optimize the critical section of file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240805-gesaugt-crashtest-705884058a28@brauner>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 08:56:59 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: jack@...e.cz, mjguzik@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com, 
	Yu Ma <yu.ma@...el.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	pan.deng@...el.com, tianyou.li@...el.com, tim.c.chen@...el.com, 
	tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] fs/file.c: optimize the critical section of
 file_lock in

On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 03:22:48PM GMT, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 01:04:44PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > Hmm...   Something fishy's going on - those are not reachable by any branches.
> > 
> > Hm, they probably got dropped when rebasing to v6.11-rc1 and I did have
> > to play around with --onto.
> > 
> > > I'm putting together (in viro/vfs.git) a branch for that area (#work.fdtable)
> > > and I'm going to apply those 3 unless anyone objects.
> > 
> > Fine since they aren't in that branch. Otherwise I generally prefer to
> > just merge a common branch.
> 
> If it's going to be rebased anyway, I don't see much difference from cherry-pick,
> TBH...

Yeah, but I generally don't rebase after -rc1 anymore unles there's
really annoying conflicts.