[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240804180338.GD2627063@thelio-3990X>
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 11:03:38 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Compiler Attributes: fix formatting of GCC/Clang doc
links
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 07:19:32PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Over time, some links have been added that did not follow the formatting
> of the rest. Fix it for consistency.
>
> No non-whitespace changes intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
It might be worth calling out the expected format (aligned on the colon)
since I was initially confused until I looked a little harder :)
> ---
> include/linux/compiler_attributes.h | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
> index 2d1ad2a74a4e..a6e8c9406f7a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@
> * goto <label>;
> * return [expression];
> *
> - * gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Statement-Attributes.html#Statement-Attributes
> + * gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Statement-Attributes.html#Statement-Attributes
> * clang: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#fallthrough
> */
> #if __has_attribute(__fallthrough__)
> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@
> #endif
>
> /*
> - * gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#Common-Function-Attributes
> + * gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#Common-Function-Attributes
> * clang: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#flatten
> */
> # define __flatten __attribute__((flatten))
> @@ -264,8 +264,8 @@
> /*
> * Optional: only supported since GCC >= 7.1
> *
> - * gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#index-no_005fprofile_005finstrument_005ffunction-function-attribute
> - * clang: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#no-profile-instrument-function
> + * gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#index-no_005fprofile_005finstrument_005ffunction-function-attribute
> + * clang: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#no-profile-instrument-function
> */
> #if __has_attribute(__no_profile_instrument_function__)
> # define __no_profile __attribute__((__no_profile_instrument_function__))
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@
> * Optional: only supported since GCC >= 11.1
> *
> * gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#index-no_005fstack_005fprotector-function-attribute
> - * clang: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#no-stack-protector-safebuffers
> + * clang: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#no-stack-protector-safebuffers
> */
> #if __has_attribute(__no_stack_protector__)
> # define __no_stack_protector __attribute__((__no_stack_protector__))
> --
> 2.46.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists