linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: iio: asahi-kasei,ak8975: drop incorrect AK09116 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0d7b2c67-d16a-4662-9d98-1e55e70c3205@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 18:40:05 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jonathan Albrieux <jonathan.albrieux@...il.com>,
 Matt Ranostay <matt@...ostay.sg>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: iio: asahi-kasei,ak8975: drop incorrect
 AK09116 compatible

On 06/08/2024 18:11, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 17:02:49 +0100
> Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 07:30:16AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> All compatibles in this binding without prefixes were deprecated, so
>>> adding a new deprecated one after some time is not allowed, because it
>>> defies the core logic of deprecating things.
>>>
>>> Drop the AK09916 vendorless compatible.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 76e28aa97fa0 ("iio: magnetometer: ak8975: add AK09116 support")
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Offending commit did not even bother to Cc devicetree mailing list and
>>> DT maintainers... Lovely. Let's ignore submitting patches and
>>> maintainers just to sneak my important patch into the kernel.
>>
>> :/
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> 
> Let's assume mistake rather than malicious.
> I should have noticed this :(

You have enough of patches going through your hands, so I did not want
to say that it was your job to notice.

It was job of submitter to follow the process - run get_maintainers.pl...

Best regards,
Krzysztof