[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c54832e02d1dbf7597a2c2d57e665e1a@manjaro.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 19:32:07 +0200
From: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
To: Florian Klink <flokli@...kli.de>
Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>, Muhammed Efe Cetin
<efectn@...tonmail.com>, FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki@...xa.com>, Tamás Szűcs <tszucs@...tonmail.ch>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add rfkill node for M.2 E wifi
on orangepi-5-plus
On 2024-08-07 19:28, Florian Klink wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 07:17:49PM GMT, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, 7. August 2024, 19:15:03 CEST schrieb Dragan Simic:
>>> On 2024-08-07 19:00, Florian Klink wrote:
>>> > This follows the same logic as 82d40b141a4c ("arm64: dts: rockchip: add
>>> > rfkill node for M.2 Key E WiFi on rock-5b").
>>> >
>>> > On the orangepi-5-plus, there's also a GPIO pin connecting the WiFi
>>> > enable signal inside the M.2 Key E slot.
>>> >
>>> > The exact GPIO PIN can be validated in the Armbian rk-5.10-rkr4 kernel
>>> > rk3588-orangepi-5-plus.dtsi file [1], which contains a `wifi_disable`
>>> > node referencing RK_PC4 on &gpio0.
>>> >
>>> > Signed-off-by: Florian Klink <flokli@...kli.de>
>>> > Tested-by: Florian Klink <flokli@...kli.de>
>>> > Link:
>>> > https://github.com/armbian/linux-rockchip/blob/9fbe23c9da24f236c6009f42d3f02c1ffb84c169/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-orangepi-5-plus.dts
>>> > [1]
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, this isn't how the "Link: ..." tag is to be used, or
>>> how
>>> a reference is to be provided. Please see the patch submission
>>> linked
>>> below for a correct example of providing links as references.
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/4449f7d4eead787308300e2d1d37b88c9d1446b2.1717308862.git.dsimic@manjaro.org/T/#u
>>
>> please also don't post v2 patches as replies to v1.
>> Instead start a new mail thread please.
>>
>> A lot of tooling cannot really find the correct version in such
>> multiversion threads.
>
> sorry for the noise. I sent a v3, addressing the requested changes, as
> a
> new thread.
>
> Somewhat offtopic for this patch, but it'd be great if
> process/submitting-patches.html could include:
>
> - A mention of the kernel quotation style for commit ids and subjects
> and how to produce them
> - A styleguide for how to link to references
> - An active discouragement from using --in-reply-to for v2 (which
> differs from what `git send-email` proposes).
I'd suggest that you go ahead and whip up a new patch that adds those
specific instructions to the documentation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists