linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] x86/entry: Test ti_work for zero before processing individual bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f3b75c38-169f-43a2-bced-d9d6153b8d55@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 16:03:31 -0700
From: Xin Li <xin@...or.com>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com,
        seanjc@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] x86/entry: Test ti_work for zero before processing
 individual bits

On 8/7/2024 9:21 AM, Brian Gerst wrote:
>> +               fpregs_assert_state_consistent();
> This call was originally unconditional, and does nothing if
> TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD is set.

lost my mind! Thanks!