linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] x86/entry: Test ti_work for zero before processing individual bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0f2ac93d-5fb5-471d-9244-75f98a8fec45@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 16:01:54 -0700
From: Xin Li <xin@...or.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, seanjc@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] x86/entry: Test ti_work for zero before processing
 individual bits

On 8/7/2024 11:08 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> -	fpregs_assert_state_consistent();
> Please keep this unconditional and independent of ti_work. It's a debug
> feature and you kill coverage with making it conditional on ti_work.

Sigh, I'm an idiot.

Thanks!
     Xin