lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e9f8931-0fd8-5808-8898-761e31e55208@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 17:16:27 +0800
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...weicloud.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
 Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
 Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
 Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jeff Vander Stoep
 <jeffv@...gle.com>, Nick Kralevich <nnk@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selinux: Fix potential counting error in
 avc_add_xperms_decision()



On 2024/8/7 0:30, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> The count increases only when a node is successfully added to
>> the linked list.
> 
> 1. Please improve such a change description with an imperative wording.
>    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.11-rc2#n94
Ok, I'll try to improve it.

> 
> 2. How do you think about to omit the word “potential” from the summary phrase?
I added "potential" because it's unlikely that the memory request will fail. Maybe "possible" would
be better.


> 
> 
> Regards,
> Markus
> .
> 

-- 
Regards,
  Zhen Lei


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ