[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e6b4e0d8-7183-4ff4-a373-cb1c0c98d993@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 11:20:17 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@...il.com, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 08/10] arm64: dts: exynos: Add initial support for
exynos8895 SoC
On 07/08/2024 10:28, ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@...il.com wrote:
> From: Ivaylo Ivanov <ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@...il.com>
>
> Exynos 8895 SoC is an ARMv8 mobile SoC found in the Samsung Galaxy
> S8 (dreamlte), S8 Plus (dream2lte), Note 8 (greatlte) and the Meizu
> 15 Plus (m1891). Add minimal support for that SoC, including:
>
> - All 8 cores via PSCI
> - ChipID
> - Generic ARMV8 Timer
> - Enumarate all pinctrl nodes
>
> Further platform support will be added over time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Ivanov <ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@...il.com>
> ---
> .../boot/dts/exynos/exynos8895-pinctrl.dtsi | 1378 +++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8895.dtsi | 253 +++
> 2 files changed, 1631 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8895-pinctrl.dtsi
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8895.dtsi
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8895-pinctrl.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8895-pinctrl.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..1dcb61e2e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8895-pinctrl.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,1378 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> +/*
> + * Samsung's Exynos 8895 SoC pin-mux and pin-config device tree source
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2024, Ivaylo Ivanov <ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@...il.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +#include "exynos-pinctrl.h"
> +
> +&pinctrl_alive {
> + gpa0: gpa0 {
I do not believe this was tested. See maintainer SoC profile for Samsung
Exynos.
Limited review follows due to lack of testing.
> +};
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8895.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8895.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..3ed381ee5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8895.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> +/*
> + * Samsung's Exynos 8895 SoC device tree source
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2024, Ivaylo Ivanov <ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@...il.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +
> +/ {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos8895";
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> +
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> +
> + aliases {
> + pinctrl0 = &pinctrl_alive;
> + pinctrl1 = &pinctrl_abox;
> + pinctrl2 = &pinctrl_vts;
> + pinctrl3 = &pinctrl_fsys0;
> + pinctrl4 = &pinctrl_fsys1;
> + pinctrl5 = &pinctrl_busc;
> + pinctrl6 = &pinctrl_peric0;
> + pinctrl7 = &pinctrl_peric1;
> + };
> +
> + arm-a53-pmu {
Are there two pmus?
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53-pmu";
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 24 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 27 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 40 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 41 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 42 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 43 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupt-affinity = <&cpu0>,
> + <&cpu1>,
> + <&cpu2>,
> + <&cpu3>,
> + <&cpu4>,
> + <&cpu5>,
> + <&cpu6>,
> + <&cpu7>;
> + };
> +
> + cpus {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + cpu-map {
> + cluster0 {
> + core0 {
> + cpu = <&cpu0>;
> + };
> + core1 {
> + cpu = <&cpu1>;
> + };
> + core2 {
> + cpu = <&cpu2>;
> + };
> + core3 {
> + cpu = <&cpu3>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + cluster1 {
> + core0 {
> + cpu = <&cpu4>;
> + };
> + core1 {
> + cpu = <&cpu5>;
> + };
> + core2 {
> + cpu = <&cpu6>;
> + };
> + core3 {
> + cpu = <&cpu7>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +
> + cpu0: cpu@100 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
> + reg = <0x100>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + };
> +
> + cpu1: cpu@101 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
> + reg = <0x101>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + };
> +
> + cpu2: cpu@102 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
> + reg = <0x102>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + };
> +
> + cpu3: cpu@103 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
> + reg = <0x103>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + };
> +
> + cpu4: cpu@0 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "samsung,mongoose-m2";
> + reg = <0x0>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + };
> +
> + cpu5: cpu@1 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "samsung,mongoose-m2";
> + reg = <0x1>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + };
> +
> + cpu6: cpu@2 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "samsung,mongoose-m2";
> + reg = <0x2>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + };
> +
> + cpu7: cpu@3 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "samsung,mongoose-m2";
> + reg = <0x3>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + psci {
> + compatible = "arm,psci";
> + method = "smc";
> + cpu_suspend = <0xc4000001>;
> + cpu_off = <0x84000002>;
> + cpu_on = <0xc4000003>;
> + };
> +
> + timer {
> + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> + /* Hypervisor Virtual Timer interrupt is not wired to GIC */
> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> + <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> + <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> + <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
> + clock-frequency = <26000000>;
Hm? I think this was explicitly disallowed.
> + };
> +
> + fixed-rate-clocks {
Keep order of properties, just like DTS coding style asks.
Anyway, fixed-rate-clocks wrapper is not needed, drop.
> + oscclk: osc-clock {
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + clock-output-names = "oscclk";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + soc: soc@0 {
> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x20000000>;
> +
> + chipid@...00000 {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos8895-chipid",
> + "samsung,exynos850-chipid";
> + reg = <0x10000000 0x24>;
> + };
> +
> + gic: interrupt-controller@...00000 {
> + compatible = "arm,gic-400";
> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> + #address-cells = <0>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + reg = <0x10201000 0x1000>,
> + <0x10202000 0x1000>,
> + <0x10204000 0x2000>,
> + <0x10206000 0x2000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) |
> + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
> + };
> +
> + pinctrl_alive: pinctrl@...b0000 {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos8895-pinctrl";
> + reg = <0x164b0000 0x1000>;
> +
> + wakeup-interrupt-controller {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos8895-wakeup-eint",
> + "samsung,exynos7-wakeup-eint";
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + pinctrl_abox: pinctrl@...60000 {
This does not look ordered. See DTS coding style.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists